Train your workforce.
Close the skills gap.Before your competitors do.
Structured workforce development programs aligned to business priorities — not random course purchases with no ROI. Built on 32 years of enterprise quality engineering expertise.
Training without strategy
is an expense.
No alignment
Managers buying courses on their P-card. LinkedIn Learning at 8% utilization. Conference badges that don't transfer into skills.
No measurement
The CFO asks "what did we get for the $500K we spent on training?" and the honest answer is "we're not sure."
No retention
Employees leave for companies that invest in their growth. The cost of one unfilled role: $150K in lost productivity plus $30K recruiting.
Assessment first.
Curriculum second.
Workforce Assessment
2–4 weeksMap current skills against strategic priorities. Identify the gaps that are actually costing you money.
Curriculum Design
Build role-specific learning paths aligned to business objectives. No generic catalogs.
Training Delivery
4–8 weeksLive, hybrid, and self-paced. Microlearning for retention. Hands-on labs, not just slides.
Measure & Expand
Track completion, certification rates, and business impact. Expand to additional teams and domains.
Seven domains. 550+ courses.
Every technical role covered.
Built through our partnership with accredited training providers. Rex Black contributes proprietary QA and testing content from 32 years of enterprise consulting. Partner network extends across AI, cloud, cyber, and beyond.
Quality Assurance & Testing
ASTQB AccreditedAI & Machine Learning
Data Science & Analytics
Cloud & DevOps
Project & Process Management
Software Engineering
Upskill your entire organization
not one person at a time.
Assess skill gaps across roles and departments
Design curriculum aligned to your strategic priorities
Deploy training with flexible delivery — live, hybrid, self-paced
Measure ROI with completion tracking and competency data
Efficiency you can
actually measure.
Training ROI visibility
Course completion rate
Time to certified workforce
Skills gap assessment
Active programs with enterprise clients including Epic Games. ASTQB-accredited ISTQB training. Simplilearn partnership extending reach across 40+ learning paths.
Stop buying random courses.
Start building capabilities.
More in this area
Articles, talks, guides, case studies, and reference artifacts that show up on the same kinds of engagements.
- Whitepaper
Starting AI Adoption: A Sequence for Mid-Market Engineering Teams
The order of operations we use with mid-market engineering teams that have been told to ship AI and do not know where to start. Six stages, named exit criteria, the anti-patterns that predict failure, and the first-90-days view that ties architecture, evaluation, and model economics into a coherent adoption sequence.
Read → - Whitepaper
Building a Defensible L&D Budget for Engineering Organizations
Engineering L&D budgets are scrutinized harder than most line items because the outcomes look soft. They do not have to. This paper covers the budget framework that makes the engineering L&D investment defensible to a CFO: how to size the spend per engineer, how to allocate across certification, internal upskilling, and conference attendance, how to attach measurable outcomes that finance accepts, and how to defend the budget when belt-tightening starts.
Read → - Whitepaper
Beyond ISTQB: A Multi-Domain Certification Roadmap for Technical L&D
Most engineering L&D programs over-index on a single certification family, usually ISTQB on the QA side, AWS on the infrastructure side, and under-invest across the rest of the technical domains the org actually needs. This paper covers a multi-domain certification roadmap (QA, AI, cloud, data, security, project management, software engineering) with sequencing logic for each level of the engineering ladder, plus the maintenance discipline that keeps the roadmap relevant as the technology shifts underneath it.
Read → - Guide
The ISTQB Advanced Level path, mapped
The Advanced Level landscape keeps changing — CTAL-TA v4.0 shipped May 2025, CTAL-TM is on v3.0, CTAL-TAE is on v2.0. This guide maps all four core modules, prerequisites, exam formats, sunset dates, and which module a given role should take first. Links directly to the authoritative istqb.org syllabi.
Read → - Document · Job Description
A job description for the test automation engineer you actually need.
A detailed job description for an Automated Test Engineer, structured around the four dimensions that make the role succeed: technical skill, results tracking, team contribution, and career growth.
Read → - Document · Job Description
A test manager JD that names the real job.
A concise Software Test Manager job description that names the four things the role is actually responsible for: hands-on leadership, credible quality assessment, cross-functional coordination, and staffing.
Read →